Chetan Bhagat's dissection of “Bhakts’’ – albeit mildly amusing – is superficial and
simplistic, as one has generally come to
expect of him. Abuse or insults in any
form can’t be condoned – but the Freudian explanation of Bhagat (whom the
‘’adarsh liberal’’ twitterati have gleefully welcomed back to their fold as ‘’a
reformed Bhakt’’) – ignoring its deeper
socio-political roots - is specious at best.
In 1967, when the first United
Front Government came to power in West Bengal by dislodging Congress - Ram Chatterjee, a Minister from one of the
alliance partners (Forward Block, Marxist) stormed the Calcutta Swimming Club
(till then an exclusive preserve of expatriates and foreigners – as the Breach
Candy Club in Mumbai still is) with a truck-load of Santhal Adivasis.
While the Santhals jumped into the pool - Chatterjee and his cronies raided the
bar - exhausted the entire stock of imported liquor. This was Calcutta’s Bastille
moment of sorts and soon the Club was forced to open its doors to Indians (read
'natives').
When Twitter arrived on the Indian
scene, it began largely as a parlour for the ‘’English Speaking’’ elite. At one
level it was the Social Media equivalent of IIC for the Lutyens’ liberals, at
another it was a hang-out for the yuppies and the social parvenus discussing
Bollywood, Restaurants and Cricket (or MUFC and Arsenal at night). Narendra
Modi unleashed his army of followers into this sacred land - much like Ram
Chatterjee did at the Calcutta Swimming Club – starting a cultural Kurukshetra
as it were. It may be argued – this was a democratisation of Twitter – a
reality that was quickly recognised by the new-kid-on-the block AAP and later
also grudgingly accepted (with limited success so far) by a stodgy Congress.
Contrary to Bhagat’s assertion
- that the Bhakt-brigade suffers from deep-seated inferiority complex – it is,
in fact, the Boston Brahmins of MSM who viewed this as an invasion into their
inherited territory and felt threatened and insecure at the prospect of the political
and social narrative was being hijacked from their control. This led to the
disparaging coinage of terms like ‘’Bhakts’’ and ‘’Internet Hindus’’ – which
invited counter invectives like ‘’Adarsh Liberals’’. (Later we shall see a similar action replay
from the ‘’Bhakts’’ at the intrusion of ‘’AAPtards’’ into what they considered,
by now, their well-won space). The same attitude is visible in the hostile and
condescending attitude of the talking heads on English TV Channels.
It may be true, many ‘Bhakts’
lack the ‘’intellectual wherewithal’’ (to borrow a phrase from the highly cerebral
Hartosh Singh Bal) – but there is no reason for them to feel apologetic about
it. They can’t be blamed for their lack of sophistication and social skills –
as they are a product of the educational system and social structure the country
provided them all these years and they are not as privileged as the few
Oxbridge, Stephen’s or JNU educated self-appointed custodians of secularism and
democracy.
Unlike in MSM –opinions can’t
be blocked en-masse editorially on Social Media – despite any amount of “gate-keeping’’.
Through Twitter the so called “Bhakts’’ think they have found their rightful voice and
feel empowered to participate in the national discourse, which has so far been a
monopoly of the “Macaulay-Putras’’.
Whether his detractors like it
or not Narendra Modi is a phenomenon - that represents the hopes and aspirations
of a huge section of the population who feel they were not adequately
represented in the national polity so far. Therefore, any attack on Narendra
Modi is seen by this section as an assault on their constituency. One may
argue, if supporters of Jayalalitha or Mamata were on Twitter in equally large
numbers – they would have behaved quite similarly. ‘’Modi as a man’’ may fail –
and could well turn out to be a God with feet of Clay. But, the idea of India
which he has unleashed is here to stay.
Interestingly, since Twitter
remains a largely English dominated medium - there are not too many
multi-lingual intellectuals who engage on Twitter. But, it may not be very
inaccurate to say our “Bhasha” intellectuals – whether on Social Media or MSM
are far more tolerant of Right-Wing views than their English brotherhood. Not
sure, if it would be correct to draw any correlation between this perceived
difference in attitude and the now clichéd distinction between India Vs Bharat.
So people like Rana Ayyub may
celebrate the ‘Ghar-wapasi’ of prodigal members of the English speaking elite
like Chetan Bhagat. But, she would be well advised to recognise – that this
motley group of PLU’s (People Like Us)
will have very limited influence over the future discourse – which is likely to
be dominated by PLTs (People Like Them). Therefore, baiting them with
supercilious barbs is only going to beget vituperative outburst and define the
battle lines much more sharply.
No amount of Social Media
Policing or “Bhakt-Hunt’’ can cure this malady. But, accepting the reality that
– PLTs are here to stay and allowing
them adequate space and time to mature
in what is a new medium for all - will pave the way for more civil
interaction in the times to come at any forum.
And, as far as Chetan Bhagat is
concerned – he should be thankful that so few Indians are good in English
otherwise Amitav Ghosh’ novels would have sold more than his own.
Article first published in @DailyO_ on 12th July 2015 Click here for link