[PK becomes
Bollywood’s biggest grosser ever]
Let me start with a few confessions. I have not seen PK nor have any intention of
watching it. I hold nothing against those who went for it and loved it. I am
happy for Raju Hirani and Aamir Khan that the movie has been the highest
grosser. I can only feel sorry for those who tried to get it banned or withdrawn
from the theatres but didn’t succeed.
And, finally I agree with Anushka Sharma that what she has done with her lips
is entirely her business and she is fine as long as Virat Kohli doesn’t have a
problem. Others are free to like or dislike her new look.
In fact, this last line pretty much sums up my position on
all works of art – whether it’s a book, painting, sculpture, theatre or movie.
Take them for what it’s worth – feel free to like, dislike or reject but don’t
decide on behalf of others. If it is trash – the public themselves will reject
it, which would be the biggest snub to the one who has written or made it. A
bad product sinks without a trace and giving it undue attention can only bestow it with
an added lease of life (E.g.– by talking too much about Anushka’s missing pout – it can actually turn to be a
fashion trend like size zero. Just saying.)
The debate in my judgment lies elsewhere. The dichotomy
between faith and rationalism has been in built into every society and religion
from time immemorial – just as the conflict between the head and the heart in human
nature. This is at times manifest in religious texts itself. While the Gita and
Upanishads in Hinduism are largely intellectual – the Ramayana relies more on
mythical allegories. (Though sometimes
people can try to invent pseudo
scientific explanations to myths such as plastic surgery to an elephant God or
IVF or test-tube conception for a virgin). These are the 2 sides of the same coin – the
Yin and the Yang as it were. I always cite the example of perhaps the greatest
legal luminary India produced – who was at once a devotee of Sri Aurobindo (who
was as cerebral as one can get) and a miracle spewing saffron-clad hair-raising
Godman of Andhra Pradesh. And, you have the example of Vivekananda himself –
who was pure brain and his own Guru – Ramakrishna an embodiment of Bhakti and
mysticism.
Belief in miracles or the power of penance, pilgrimage and rituals has been there from
the inception of mankind. It, perhaps, stems from man’s realization of his own
limitations and the existence of a larger power in the universe – beyond his
control – against whom he is but as helpless as an ant. It is to protect himself
against such a force or the elements does
he seek the shelter of ‘religion’. Now to question, whether these devices work – would be as
self-defeating as arguing with a votary of homeopathy about the scientific
improbability of such a therapy working. Call it ‘placebo’ effect if you will –
but it may have its utility. Again to quote Sri Ramakrishna - “Vishwas-e Mila-e Vastu, tarkey bohu dur” (faith
dissolves of things that arguments can’t resolve) or the bard “There are more
things in heaven and earth, Horatio..”.
How religion has been exploited over the centuries for
geo-political ambitions ends is not the subject of this discussion. As long as
the human race exists there will always be a ‘spiritual bazaar’ – where brands
and products will come and go. I daresay ‘sexcapades’ under saintly garbs or cassocks of priesthood have
also existed since ancient times – across religions and countries. But, it is
the marketing and building huge commercial empires around them that is a
relatively recent phenomenon and merits deeper inquiry.
It’s no mean task to manage multi-crore commercial empires
(I had read somewhere, one Yoga Guru’s net worth is reportedly valued at Rs 14k
crores). Having spent a better part of my working life in Consumer Products and
Media industry I know a thing or two
about the challenges and complexity of running a business. Any executive of FMCG
companies like HUL or ITC will tell you – managing the supply chain, sales, marketing
of 100s of SKUs (stock keeping units) across a nationwide distribution network
is no “sadhu’s” play. Similarly, operating a business model out of producing and
selling audio-visual labels, publishing, web-retailing, event management and marketing calls for a
high level of expertise, core-competency and, above all, requires a commercial
organization. The successful marketing of the Patanjali Ayurvedic range can
give Himalaya Drugs or Dabur a serious run for their money. And, ask Ponytail Chaudhuri how difficult it
is to create a chain of colleges and Preetha Reddy or Devi Shetty about hospitals.. These businesses or institutions can’t
be efficiently and effectively run by volunteers alone. Most of them have
franchises both domestic and foreign which are source of substantial revenue
streams which too have to be managed and the earnings judiciously invested to generate
continuous returns to fund future expansions
– just as Chief of Treasury in a large corporation would do. Many banks, professional
fund managers, financial advisors and brokers have large Ashrams as their key clients.
And, no wonder some of them have to engage private armies to manage acres of
prime real-estate.
Management of Religious Institutional Businesses can,
therefore, be the subject of Business School case studies and, one day, may be
offered as a course in Harvard or Stanford. It is my thesis many of these God-men and Gurus are fronts .
Behind them are clever businessmen who
run a sophisticate operation. They first invest in creating a brand (perhaps,
even engage marketing or image management consultants) and then exploit it as a
pure commercial venture.
But, where does that leave the poor devotee or ‘Bhakt’ ? That brings me back to another
favourite quote of Sri Ramakrishna – “Jadio Amar Guru Shuri Baadi Jaye, tobu O
amar guru Nityananda Roy” – roughly translated – even though my guru may visit
a bar or a brothel, he will always remain my Guru. In essence, once you have surrendered at the
feet of the Guru - by that act itself if
you have moved one step up the spiritual ladder. And, that’s also the key both
these Godmen use as also Amir Khan and Raju Hirani who make commercially
successful movies out of them. One man’s faith is another man’s business – or
put differently Anushka’s lips may be a turn you and me off – but as long as
the movie is a box office hit – who cares ?
(Article first published in the @DailyO on January 5th, 2014)
Lips or Hips! Trespassing in private domains is a way of life for many in our society.
ReplyDeleteMarketing has long overtaken substance. Big banners have mostly got it right in spite of wide variations in quality and the common multitude flock to theaters carried away by the hype, cinema being their only major source of entertainment.
In my opinion, PK is no match to a "Taare Zamin Par" or wholesome entertainers like "Three Ediots".